Graham Perrett has mentioned “Gaza” 10 times in Parliament since October 2023.

While Graham Perrett may have expressed a number of the positions below in the media and private communications, we assess their public statements in Parliament.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS NOT called for an immediate and sustained ceasefire.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett DID NOT call for the immediate restoration of Australia’s funding to UNRWA, a United Nations agency and the largest humanitarian organisation in Gaza.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS called on Israel to allow unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid into the occupied Gaza Strip.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS condemned war crimes committed by Israel in Gaza by name, as documented by Amnesty International and other reputable human rights organisations.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS called on Israel to comply with the provisional orders of the International Court of Justice, the top court of the United Nations, acknowledging there is a plausible risk of genocide being committed by Israel.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS NOT called for a comprehensive arms embargo on all parties involved in the conflict, including an immediate halt on Australian defence goods being exported to Israel and Australian defence contacts with Israeli companies.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS NOT called for a lift to the 16-year illegal blockade on Gaza.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS NOT acknowledged the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, including the need to recognise a sovereign and independent State of Palestine.

In Parliament, Graham Perrett HAS acknowledged the need to address the root causes of the conflict, including dismantling Israel’s system of apartheid against all Palestinians

👇🏾 Read Graham Perrett’s relevant speeches below in full.

✉️ Email Graham Perrett at graham.perrett.mp@aph.gov.au.

Moreton has three mosques in it and several others close by. There are people living in my electorate right now who are attending one of those mosques because the country they were born in no longer exists. It no longer exists because, overnight, politicians—acting in their own self-interest—decided that people of different faiths could no longer live together peacefully in Yugoslavia. Yugoslavian politicians decided that, despite those faiths having lived together for 45 generations.

Race, like ethnicity, is a social construct. Children don’t understand it until adults teach it to them. I saw that in my own kids when they were growing up in my home suburb of Moorooka, where there’s a large African diaspora. My children were completely colourblind to race and hopefully still are. Instilling hatred in people does nothing except undermine their ability to connect with other people as human beings, and it undermines their ability to be empathetic. Once you go down that path, it’s a path to nowhere. All Palestinians and Israelis are entitled to a life free of violence and free of fear. All Israelis and Palestinians have a right to a future where they see their children thrive and prosper and to live in a world at peace with their neighbours where they are all equal, and hopefully where they are colourblind.

People in my community and across Australia are distraught at the stories they’re hearing, the images they’re seeing, the terms that are being repeated over and over again in parliament. They are shocked by the destruction and brutality that is happening, on both sides, particularly at Hamas’s hands on 7 October and around that date and by the Israeli government response since.

Now, I don’t claim to have an answer to any of this, but I do know that we cannot measure atrocities by a standard that we think is acceptable or think that the Hamas atrocities should somehow permit the suspension of international humanitarian law. These are the rules that were developed after World War II and the extreme horror of the Holocaust—something so significant in the creation of Israel and all those other extremes associated with World War II. It was the war that saw 15 million military personnel die. But, most significantly, 38 million civilians died. Thus international humanitarian law said that there are some moral absolutes: orders that can’t be obeyed, that you cannot lawfully obey, even if coming from your superior officer—fog-of-war actions that can result in courtroom convictions in later times of peace. The world is watching and judging—literally judging.

I know that there are too many innocent people in Gaza who are now paying the price for those horrific actions of Hamas that I condemn outright. It is right that all of Australia condemns the actions of Hamas and their attacks on innocent civilians. I especially acknowledge that Hamas does not have the best interests of Palestinians in mind, even those in Gaza, the most densely populated place on Earth. So let’s be clear about these actions and whose interests Hamas has acted in. As I’ve said, these actions were not in the interests of any Palestinians. They were designed to be brutal, to instil fear and create division, not just in the Middle East but across the world—even in multicultural communities like Australia. Like any form of terrorism, these actions were designed to make people in multicultural communities, like mine in Moreton, feel unsafe and fearful. They were designed to pit groups of people against each other and generate violent outrage, maybe in the hope that politicians would overnight decide that faith and races that have lived together peacefully for generations cannot now do so.

To suggest that Hamas’s actions represent the Palestinian struggles demeans the Palestinians, their struggle for freedom and their human rights. Australia has unequivocally condemned the attacks by Hamas, including the indiscriminate rocket attacks fired on cities and civilians, and that horrific taking of hostages, as well as all that footage that the internet is now able to amplify through those horrible algorithms, and people are prepared to echo the terms surrounding it. Australia has consistently said—and legally said—that Israel must act within the rules of law, that every country must do so, and that Israel and others must ensure that they act to protect civilian lives. The collective punishment of the innocent civilian population of Gaza via cutting off power, water, food and medical supplies not only is cruel and against humanitarian law but also could inadvertently—I really fear this—become a recruitment drive for Hamas. The Geneva convention very specifically says, ‘Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.’ I’ll go back to what I said before: we should not start to measure atrocities and accept that behaviour by what we think is worse or better than the other. We should remember that they are all atrocities, and all should be condemned as such. Peace does not get closer by killing more children.

The Palestinians and Jewish communities and their allies in Australia want to see an end to this conflict. All sensible politicians want to see an end to this conflict. They want to see an end to the death and destruction, and they want to see peace in a place that should not be so filled with violence and tragedy. Like Minister Wong and so many other Australian politicians, I call on Hamas to release all 199 hostages immediately as a gesture towards peace. I also call on the Israeli government to stop the blockade of water, food, power and medical supplies to Gaza. I’m reminded of this quote from Anne Lamott:

You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.

I know that the God that the Palestinians and the Jewish people in my community believe in is a peaceful God, and, God willing, peace will prevail in this situation.
— Graham Perrett, Tuesday, 17 October 2023 (6:09 PM)
The term ‘war crime’ is one we hear often, but I want to explain what it actually means. This is important in light of the escalation of civilian deaths in Gaza, despite efforts to negotiate a peace by Australia and other countries with much more influence. Australia and many other countries have called for Israel to abide by the International Court of Justice ruling that it must take measures to prevent genocide in Gaza. It is tragic that, nearly six months on, the situation continues to be devastating, with little progress made towards a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the people of Gaza are suffering on a scale that is unimaginable. They are living with daily bombings, deaths and starvation, mainly because of Israel’s refusal to let enough food into Gaza. Blocking that is both official and achieved via systemic go-slows and citizen action that is unlawful. How could anyone perpetrate such an act of barbarism on children?

I travelled to Israel as part of a parliamentary delegation—something not funded by lobbyists—and I witnessed the way Palestinians were treated. Their daily lives are ruled by checkpoints. I saw different roads for different races, and I know that there are two systems of justice for children based on race. Societies that have a two-tier system are never harmonious places. Today there are many in my community who feel helpless and angry and who are struggling to comprehend the enormity of the devastation and death. This conflict is extremely divisive. Everyone has an opinion, a story and a conspiracy theory, and some are devoted to lying about the facts. But the one thing we can all agree on is that the atrocities committed against civilians, regardless of who has committed them and why, deserve redress via international humanitarian law as enforced by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

International humanitarian law applies to armed conflicts and was largely a result of the horrors of World War II. Its core objective is to protect people who are not or who are no longer participating in a conflict, and to restrict the means and methods of warfare. Serious breaches of international humanitarian law are known as war crimes. International humanitarian law stems from the customary international law and the 1949 reviews of the Geneva conventions. Remember, those first three conventions cover soldiers, sailors and prisoners of war. The fourth, from 1949, relates to the protection of civilians, including those living in occupied territories. Additional protocols were added in 1977 concerning victims of international armed conflicts and victims of non-international armed conflicts.

In 2004 the International Court of Justice designated that the Palestinian territories—that is, Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem—are under occupation. The International Committee of the Red Cross asserts that the legal framework in the Palestinian territories, certainly before 7 October, is the law of belligerent occupation. The International Committee of the Red Cross states:

International humanitarian law protects those who do not take part in the fighting, such as civilians and medical and religious military personnel.

… … …

These categories of person are entitled to respect for their lives and for their physical and mental integrity … They must be protected and treated humanely in all circumstances, with no adverse distinction.

This is the law of the world we live in—rules that evolved from the horror that saw six million people murdered in the Holocaust. These are humanity’s absolutes:

International humanitarian law prohibits all means and methods of warfare which:

It is obvious from the estimated 1.5 to 1.9 million displaced Palestinians that this has been disregarded by Israel.

I’m not here to list the war crimes committed since 7 October last year, but I want to call out the atrocities with the intention that the world holds all perpetrators to account. I am talking about the deliberate targeting of civilians—especially women and children—indiscriminate rocket attacks and the taking of civilians as hostages. I’m also talking about Israel’s deliberate obstruction of basic services—water, fuel and aid to Gaza. These are the acts that Human Rights Watch have described as collective punishment that amount to war crimes and include the use of starvation of civilians as a weapon of war. The UN High Commissioner has grave concerns about Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law, including the principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions in attack. The world is watching this horrific conflict.
— Graham Perrett, Tuesday, 19 March 2024 (7:55 PM)
📑 Source: HansarD 1, HANSARD 2
Last Updated: 7 April 2024
Muslim Votes Matter, and so does the reliability and accuracy of the information WE SHARE. While we uphold strict data standards and have rigorous information checks, the community’s input & support is vital. If you identify any DATA discrepancies, PLEASE reach out at contact@muslimvotesmatter.com.au.